On sön, 2008-06-15 at 10:57 +0800, Arkin Y wrote:
> Acctually , I tried to use Linux OS default malloc, gnu malloc , dlmalloc,
> dlmalloc could help me get the best performance among the three different
> malloc .
Interesting.
For me dlmalloc fails completely when the process size goes above 2GB.
> I checked all my mgr:info log , when I set the cache_mem to different size ,
> the stroe entries are different too .
> When the cache memory is 4GB , the Store Entries are ~519396
> When the cache memory is 6 GB , the StoreEntries are ~776836
> When the cache memory is 8 GB , the StoreEntries are ~1026097
Are you running without an on-disk store? (cache_dir)
> The average size of the stored objects almost ~8KB, so I am not sure
> whether such problem was caused by large objects .
Ok.
> I checked a hash_lookup method , If in the worst cases in 8G scenario,it
> looks like almost 2 times of hash keys will be traversed to get the
> storeEntry than in 4 G scenario.
The size of the hash table is dependent on the store size.
But I guess this calculation screws up if there is no on-disk cache of
reasonable size.
On startup, what is reported NN for "Using NN Store buckets" in
cache.log?
Regards
Henrik
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Jun 16 2008 - 12:00:03 MDT