Re: [squid-users] POST + NTLM Authentica

From: Amos Jeffries <squid3_at_treenet.co.nz>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 00:54:49 +1200

bill.allison_at_bsw.co.uk wrote:
> Thanks. Pressure of work means that it will be a few days before I can
> upgrade, but I will let you know when done. What should I consider when
> deciding whether to go 3.0 or 2.7?

Starting from 2.5, it comes down to speed these days. As a guesstimate,
I think 2.7 can handle about 10% more requests per sec, than the current
3.0.

So, IMO, if you need the speed boost go 2.7. If you are comfortable
as-is, go 3.0.

Amos

>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: squid3_at_treenet.co.nz
> Sent: 10 July 2008 12:44
> To: Bill Allison
> Cc: lfferreira_at_gmail.com; squid-users_at_squid-cache.org
> Subject: Re: [squid-users] POST + NTLM Authentica
>
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
> bill.allison_at_bsw.co.uk wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> I think this may be the same as I reported as bug 2176
>> (http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2176) against 2.6
>> STABLE17. Is it known to be fixed in 2.7 or 3.0?. Apologies for asking
> -
>> I haven't had time yet to go through changes logs for subsequent
>> versions.
>
> Ah if thats the bug, then unkown. It's still open. Primarily because we
> have not ben able to get a usable trace in the current code to find out
> whats causing it.
>
> If you upgrade you will either see it disappear; at which point we can
> get the others to test 2175 by upgrading themselves. Maybe closing the
> issue off.
> Or worst case it remains, at which point you are using a version we can
> support you while debug tracking the issue down.
>
> Amos
>
>> Bill A.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: squid3_at_treenet.co.nz
>> Sent: 10 July 2008 05:28
>> To: lfferreira_at_gmail.com
>> Cc: squid-users_at_squid-cache.org
>> Subject: Re: [squid-users] POST + NTLM Authentica
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -
>
>> --
>> Luiz Felipe Ferreira wrote:
>>> Guys,
>>>
>>> We have a squid-2.5STABLE14 with NTLM authentication.
>> Please upgrade. 2.5 has been obsolete for several years.
>>
>> We currently support primarily 3.0stable7, and 2.7stable3 for those who
>> can't upgrade to 3.0x.
>>
>> Either of which is a good upgrade form 2.5.
>>

-- 
Please use Squid 2.7.STABLE3 or 3.0.STABLE7
Received on Thu Jul 10 2008 - 12:54:53 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Jul 10 2008 - 12:00:03 MDT