Re: [squid-users] L4/L7 switch for caching

From: Henrik Nordstrom <henrik_at_henriknordstrom.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 07:19:37 +0200

tis 2008-07-15 klockan 23:46 -0300 skrev Pablo García:
> You want to balance your squid cache farm, using a URLHASH algorithm,
> to increase the hit ratio, that would be L7.

Assuiming you do transparent interception like everyone else then for
most setups, large as small, it's quite sufficient to balance based on
destination IP. But it's good if the load balancer has built-in HTTP
checks, proper monitoring each server for availability.

On the other hand, if your network (router/switch) supports WCCP then no
additional load balancer is needed as the load balancing you need is
already in the network equipment and almost auto-configured..

If you are doing explicit configuratoin (manaul or auto discovered) then
L7 is needed for load balancing if you want decent hit ratio, at least
until intra-array CARP routing gets implemented...

Regards
Henrik
Received on Wed Jul 16 2008 - 05:18:56 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Jul 16 2008 - 12:00:04 MDT