Eric B. wrote:
> "Amos Jeffries" <squid3_at_treenet.co.nz> wrote in message 
> news:499751AD.5030706_at_treenet.co.nz...
>> Eric B. wrote:
> 
>> I've found a noticable speed increase (50%) in all sites when I placed a 
>> squid box in front of the web servers. But your experience may vary.
> 
> Wow - that's amazing.  I guess I'm a little confused as to how / why squid 
> is so much more effective at serving static content than apache would be for 
> instance.  Given the same static image or the same static html, what makes 
> squid so much better / faster?
In my case it was dramatic because the apache was slowed down serving 
other sites as well as proxying for tomcat.
> 
>>> I guess I can see squid would end up offloading some of the processing 
>>> from tomcat, but if I were to put them on the same server, then it ends 
>>> up being the same CPU/disk that get used, so I don't see any advantages 
>>> there either - the processing power just gets shifted from one app to 
>>> another.
>> Tomcat will attempting to re-generate  content it does not have to, simply 
>> because it has a dynamic type or because its not storing the response 
>> headers. Squid will fix this minor CPU waste.
>> As I said though if they are on different boxes, that is when savings are 
>> maximized.
> 
> How does squid know what is static and can be cached, and what is dynamic?
As far as squid is concerned its all 'static' (dynamic stuff is 
pre-created by tomcat by the time it reaches squid).
The HTTP headers tell squid how long things can be cached for, or not in 
some cases.
> Is that based on configuration of file extensions?  ie: cache html pages, 
> jpg and gif, but not php and jsp?  Furthermore, if a request is made with 
> the same uri & query string, will squid cache the result?
If the headers permit yes.
Query strings, may need a little adjustment to the configuration on 
older squid:
http://wiki.squid-cache.org/ConfigExamples/DynamicContent
Amos
-- Please be using Current Stable Squid 2.7.STABLE6 or 3.0.STABLE13 Current Beta Squid 3.1.0.5Received on Sun Feb 15 2009 - 02:59:40 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Feb 15 2009 - 12:00:01 MST