Hi, Junyong and Amos
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 9:45 PM, Amos Jeffries <squid3_at_treenet.co.nz> wrote:
> Not at all. I wish you can succeed. And please share your expirence
> for me.
I could build it ! thank you.
(Squid 3.1, Linux Kernel 2.6.28, iptables 1.4.3rc1)
Now, I'm researching more detail.
> hmm, functionality is the same I thought.. setup and requirements
> are very different.
>
> 2.7 has the old Tproxy v2.2 (cttproxy) which has may online how-tos,
> but is officially obsolete.
>
> 3.1 has TProxy v4.1+ which is new and not much help around yet, on
> the whole IMO it's easier, what we have is detailed (with some DL
> links) at:
The above is well-formed and clear !
I could understand the current status of tproxy.
> http://wiki.squid-cache.org/Features/Tproxy4
In the document, the following configuration is missing, right ?
ip rule add fwmark 1 lookup 100
ip route add local 0.0.0.0/0 dev lo table 100
Sincerely,
--mkishi
Hi, Junyong and Amos
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 9:45 PM, Amos Jeffries <squid3_at_treenet.co.nz> wrote:
> Not at all. I wish you can succeed. And please share your expirence
> for me.
I could build it ! thank you.
(Squid 3.1, Linux Kernel 2.6.28, iptables 1.4.3rc1)
Now, I'm researching more detail.
> hmm, functionality is the same I thought.. setup and requirements
> are very different.
>
> 2.7 has the old Tproxy v2.2 (cttproxy) which has may online how-tos,
> but is officially obsolete.
>
> 3.1 has TProxy v4.1+ which is new and not much help around yet, on
> the whole IMO it's easier, what we have is detailed (with some DL
> links) at:
The above is well-formed and clear !
I could understand the current status of tproxy.
> http://wiki.squid-cache.org/Features/Tproxy4
In the document, the following configuration is missing, right ?
ip rule add fwmark 1 lookup 100
ip route add local 0.0.0.0/0 dev lo table 100
Sincerely,
--mkishi
Received on Sun Feb 22 2009 - 07:19:40 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Feb 22 2009 - 12:00:01 MST