Vivek wrote:
> Amos,
>
> Thanks for your reply.
>
> I am using 300GB for caching ( aufs ) and 16GB of RAM. If the connection
> loss is a normal one, i will reconsider the way i rotate files.
>
Hmmm, so 316 GB cache indexed is I guess somewhere up around 3GB of
journal file being calculated and written on each hourly rotate.
Yes I would expect a few seconds lag. Easily enough to explain a
temporarily lost WCCP exchange.
Amos
>
>
> Thanks again.
>
> Vivek
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
>
> From: Amos Jeffries <squid3_at_treenet.co.nz>
>
> To: Vivek <viveksnv_at_aol.in>
>
> Cc: squid-users_at_squid-cache.org
>
> Sent: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 1:27 pm
>
> Subject: Re: [squid-users] wccp service lost issue
>
>
>
> Vivek wrote:
>
>
>
>> Amos,
>
>>
>
>> I didn't see any errors related to squid restart/crash in cache.log.
> Is
>
>> there any way to debug this ?
>
>>
>
> Other than dumping the WCCP info display on the router I have no idea.
>
>
>
> As Adrian said, its probably just a temporary issue with a long index
>
> rebuild causing Squid to ignore one of the WCCP announcements.
>
>
>
> If so the loss time will remain the same no matter how frequently or
>
> infrequently you rotate. Thus less often will be less outage time.
>
>
>
> Amos
>
> --
>
> Please be using
>
> Current Stable Squid 2.7.STABLE6 or 3.0.STABLE18
>
> Current Beta Squid 3.1.0.13
> ________________________________________________________________________
> You are invited to Get a Free AOL Email ID. - http://webmail.aol.in
-- Please be using Current Stable Squid 2.7.STABLE6 or 3.0.STABLE18 Current Beta Squid 3.1.0.13Received on Mon Aug 24 2009 - 10:38:10 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Aug 24 2009 - 12:00:04 MDT