Re: [squid-users] squid 3.0

Thanks,

But if i have both 2.6 and 3.0, will they not conflict.

Vikas

On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 9:40 AM, Amos Jeffries <squid3_at_treenet.co.nz> wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Sep 2009 09:31:52 +0530, vikas rawat <rawat.vikas_at_gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> thanks, if i have both squid2.6 and squid3.0 than which would run. I
>> mean when i will give (service squid start) which version of squid
>> run. if i want to run squid3.0 what specific command to be fire.
>
> Whatever directory path and binary name you installed Squid-3.0 as.
>
> Also please if you are upgrading, go to the highest version (currently
> stable 19) available of the release being upgraded to. 3.0 has major
> security bugs all the way up to STABLE 18. And some big NTLM helper issues
> you may hit in anything older than 3.0.STABLE19.
>
> Amos
>
>>
>>
>> vikas
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 11:01 PM, Jefferson Diego
>> <jeffersondiego8_at_hotmail.com> wrote:
>>> Em 21-09-2009 14:04, vikas rawat escreveu:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I am using squid2.6.STABLE6-3.el5 on RHEL5.0, want to update with
>>>> squid-3.0.STABLE9. could you guide me how to do that.
>>>>
>>>> 1. Shoudl i remove squid2.6 first and then install squid3.0. ?
>>>> 2. Or should install squid3.0 w/o remove squid2.6. ?
>>>> 3. Can i have both?
>>>> 4. Is there any other best alternate.
>>>>
>>>> squid2.6 is working fince but facing problem to connecting FTP sites
>>>> on IE7 and authentication with Active Directory.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Vikas
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> 1. Not really. You can install squid3.0 in another directory (not in
>>> /usr/bin) and keep squid2.6...
>>> 2. You decide...
>>> 3. Yes, you can.
>>>
>
Received on Tue Sep 22 2009 - 06:50:06 MDT