Isn't it irrelevant if it implements range requests with the fs= parameter? With the fs= parameter it becomes a unique URI and squid should treat it as a separate object even if it does have a Content-Range header.
Do we know enough to be sure this is a squid bug or should I be contacting RedTube and YouPorn to fix their broken code?
-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Nottingham [mailto:mnot_at_yahoo-inc.com]
Sent: Friday, April 09, 2010 7:35 PM
To: Henrik Nordström
Cc: Amos Jeffries; squid-users_at_squid-cache.org
Subject: Re: [squid-users] Squid 3.1.1 and flash video scrubbing
On 09/04/2010, at 9:05 PM, Henrik Nordström wrote:
> We don't know how the server would react on Range requests to this
> ranged fs=.. object. Maybe it imlpements them, maybe it don't.
RED says it doesn't.
-- Mark Nottingham mnot_at_yahoo-inc.comReceived on Mon Apr 12 2010 - 19:50:43 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Apr 13 2010 - 12:00:04 MDT