True, but I recommend it, especially for the OS processing the disk I/O,
and authenticators, etc, but it's not really a requirement.
---------------------------------------------
Chad E. Naugle
Tech Support II, x. 7981
Travel Impressions, Ltd.
>>> "Bradley, Stephen W. Mr." <bradlesw_at_muohio.edu> 12/17/2010 11:44 AM
>>>
I would normally agree but until Squid fully implements SMP what would
havin
________________________________________
From: Chad Naugle [Chad.Naugle_at_travimp.com]
Sent: Friday, December 17, 2010 10:12 AM
To: Marcello Romani; squid-users_at_squid-cache.org
Subject: Re: [squid-users] Cache performance
I would also highly recommend using at least a Dual Core CPU, 1.6GHz +
for 200 users. CPU performance is also a very important factor for
user
volume.
---------------------------------------------
Chad E. Naugle
Tech Support II, x. 7981
Travel Impressions, Ltd.
>>> Marcello Romani <mromani_at_ottotecnica.com> 12/17/2010 10:01 AM >>>
Il 17/12/2010 11:09, benjamin fernandis ha scritto:
> Dear Friends,
>
> I m going to use squid for cache purpose only.And i heard that for
> squid cache performance i have to use good RAM and HDD.I have 4gb
RAM
> and 160 GB SATA HDD.And i have 200 users' network.So please suggest
me
> the same.Means can i go with this H/W specification or is there any
> suggestion....Please friends, suggest me .....And in this server i m
> using only squid for cache gain....so also suggest me for RAM also.
>
> And one more thing, for better disk performace should i have to go
> with raid 0 or any other suggestion.....
>
> And what are the main squid configuration parameter for cache
gain....?
>
> thanks,
> Benjo j.
I'm no expert but what you have to avoid is having the squid process
swap. So following the rough rule of 10MB of RAM for each GB of cache
I'd try first with a 100GB cache, which would require 1GB RAM just for
managing it. I'd keep cache mem low, like 128M. The rest of RAM would
be
used by OS for disk cache and buffers. Mount the cache dir with
noatime
option to avoid unnecessary disk accesses. To increase performance,
use
multiple cache_dir, each pointing to its own physical disk. Avoid raid
if you need performance.
That said, I don't want to sound rude, but I think your questions show
that you should do some research on your own first. Please search the
mailing list archives and the squid site. Many general questions about
squid performance and configuration can be solved just by reading
those
docs and following the links.
For a start:
http://wiki.squid-cache.org/SquidFaq/ConfiguringSquid
HTH
-- Marcello Romani Travel Impressions made the following annotations ------------------------------------------------------------- "This message and any attachments are solely for the intended recipient and may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, use, or distribution of the information included in this message and any attachments is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us by reply e-mail and immediately and permanently delete this message and any attachments. Thank you." Travel Impressions made the following annotations ------------------------------------------------------------- "This message and any attachments are solely for the intended recipient and may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, use, or distribution of the information included in this message and any attachments is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us by reply e-mail and immediately and permanently delete this message and any attachments. Thank you."Received on Fri Dec 17 2010 - 16:49:51 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Dec 17 2010 - 12:00:02 MST