Re: [squid-users] WCCP or PAC files

From: Edouard Zorrilla <ezorrilla_at_tsf.com.pe>
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 13:02:50 -0700

Thanks Luis,

My duty now is to make redundancy work on the client side using PAC files.

Let say:

10.128.0.0/16 network should use ProxyA as primary and if this one is down,
should use ProxyB.
10.129.0.0/16 network should use ProxyB as primary and if this one is down,
should use ProxyA.

Regards!.
-----Original Message-----
From: Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz
Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2011 10:52 AM
To: squid-users_at_squid-cache.org
Subject: Re: [squid-users] WCCP or PAC files

Le mercredi 16 mars 2011 10:55:06, Edouard Zorrilla a écrit :
> Hey Guys,
>
> Which feature (transparent proxy with WCCP or forwarding proxy with PAC
> files) do you feel is the most scalable for a proxy design.
>
> Let me know.,
>
> Thanks.,

Both, it depends what do you want

WCCP will be like "transparent" so you wont need to configure nothing on
clients and you cand do your balacing with 1 parent N childs if you want.

PAC, you have to configure each client or use WPAD, how ever, balancing
will
be at client side

both will work

LD
Received on Wed Mar 16 2011 - 20:02:59 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Mar 17 2011 - 12:00:03 MDT