ping, any comments on this?
excluding acl's, cache_peer* and *direct config entries (~500 lines
worth, all IP, servername, port# or url_regex based)
the remaining config file is
http_port 8000
icp_port 0
visible_hostname gromit1
cache_effective_user proxy
cache_effective_group proxy
appaend_domain .invalid.server.name
pid_filename /var/run/squid.pid
cache_dir null /tmp
client_db off
cache_access_log syslog squid
cache_log /var/log/squid/cache.log
cache_store_log none
coredump_dir none
no_cache deny all
what would I need to do to track down the cause of this performance drop?
David Lang
On Sun, 13 Mar 2011, david_at_lang.hm wrote:
> I'm using squid in a pure access control mode (all caching disabled) and am
> looking to move from 3.0 to 3.1, but when I'm doing lab tests with it I am
> seeing a significant performance drop.
>
> when doing a simple small request test (using ab to hammer the proxy
> retrieving 40 byte pages) 3.0 is reaching 4200 request/sec while under the
> exact same conditions 3.1.11 is barely topping 1400 requests/sec.
>
> if I request larger pages (100K), 3.0 does ~650 requests/sec while 3.1 only
> manages ~480 requests/sec. going up to 1M pagess, 3.0 does 90 requests/sec
> while 3.1 does 60
>
> this is with identical configuration except that 3.0 has the null disk cache
> driver configured while 3.1 has that line commented out.
>
> In all of these cases, squid is maxing out at 100% of the single core it has
> available to it.
>
> David Lang
>
Received on Thu Mar 17 2011 - 21:05:45 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Mar 18 2011 - 12:00:03 MDT