Re: [squid-users] performance drop moving from 3.0 to 3.1?

From: Amos Jeffries <squid3_at_treenet.co.nz>
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 22:16:55 +1300

On 18/03/11 21:54, david_at_lang.hm wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Mar 2011, Amos Jeffries wrote:
>
<snip>
>> Some are offset by optimizations and fixes later, so its not
>> cut-n-dry. Work is underway by Alex and Co. to identify the problems.
>> We all work on ways to grab performance back when found. Most of these
>> optimizations won't make it into 3.1, but 3.2 hopes to be better.
>
> any feel for how 3.2 is doing (how close is it to no longer being
> 'release candidate', which for some strange reason scares management
> types ;-)

So far its looking like no earlier than end-April.

FWIW we have some selective 3.2 builds running happily in production.
They just need a bit of testing before use.

Amos

-- 
Please be using
   Current Stable Squid 2.7.STABLE9 or 3.1.11
   Beta testers wanted for 3.2.0.5
Received on Fri Mar 18 2011 - 09:17:10 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Mar 19 2011 - 12:00:01 MDT