On 18/03/11 21:54, david_at_lang.hm wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Mar 2011, Amos Jeffries wrote:
>
<snip>
>> Some are offset by optimizations and fixes later, so its not
>> cut-n-dry. Work is underway by Alex and Co. to identify the problems.
>> We all work on ways to grab performance back when found. Most of these
>> optimizations won't make it into 3.1, but 3.2 hopes to be better.
>
> any feel for how 3.2 is doing (how close is it to no longer being
> 'release candidate', which for some strange reason scares management
> types ;-)
So far its looking like no earlier than end-April.
FWIW we have some selective 3.2 builds running happily in production.
They just need a bit of testing before use.
Amos
-- Please be using Current Stable Squid 2.7.STABLE9 or 3.1.11 Beta testers wanted for 3.2.0.5Received on Fri Mar 18 2011 - 09:17:10 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Mar 19 2011 - 12:00:01 MDT