Re: [squid-users] Re: squid 3.2.0.5 even slower than squid 3.1 and doesn't work with workers >1

On Mon, 21 Mar 2011, david_at_lang.hm wrote:

> Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 17:16:08 -0700 (PDT)
> From: david_at_lang.hm
> To: squid-users_at_squid-cache.org
> Subject: Re: [squid-users] Re: squid 3.2.0.5 even slower than squid 3.1 and
> doesn't work with workers >1
>
> On Mon, 21 Mar 2011, david_at_lang.hm wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 21 Mar 2011, david_at_lang.hm wrote:
>>
>>> resending without the attachments since this doesn't appear to have gotten
>>> through to the list. if this gets through I'll reply with them.
>>
>> ok, apparently the list doesn't like attachments
>
> it also has a size restriction low enough that the logs exceed it.
>
> I'll try with them as zipped attachments and see if that goes through.
>
> if not, please let me know who to send them to for more information.
>
> David Lang
>
>