[squid-users] Re: Squid did not use the next set cache

On Thu, 27 Dec 2012 10:54:09 +0100
David Touzeau wrote:

> Dear,
>
> I have set 2 caches on my squid 3.2.5
>
> #--------- Multiple cpus -- (disabled)
> workers 1
> cache_dir aufs /var/squid/cache1 1105 16 256 max-size=716800
> cache_dir ufs /var/cache/squid 2000 16 256
>
> in caches infos we ca see that the first cache is full at 94% and
> second cache is 0%
>
> Why squid did not use the second cache in order to store objects ?

Is there any particular reason that one of the caches is aufs and one
ufs?

I don't know for sure but it wouldn't surprise me if mixing the two
doesn't work well with the default selection algorithm which is
least-load. The on disk format of aufs and ufs is the same so it's easy
to test.

 
Received on Sat Dec 29 2012 - 22:24:54 MST