Let's try this again....
>> While you are busy with the deb packages, how about not putting in a
>> squid.conf and rather calling it squid.conf.default, or do "include"
>> configs like Apache ? Pretty please ? :)
>
> I'm not sure I understand the first suggestion there about squid.cofn
> and squid.conf.default?
>
> I've tried to convince people to follow the Apache config include
> style. But it gets really nasty to manage related directive ordering.
> Or did you mean something else entirely?
>
> Amos
Hi Amos,
Instead of the package containing "squid.conf", make it contain
"squid.conf.default" or "squid.conf.example"
Nope - you are spot on, I meant the Apache config include style :) What
if you use 00_ 01_ 02_ etc ?
Cheers,
Pieter
Received on Fri May 17 2013 - 08:01:34 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri May 17 2013 - 12:00:07 MDT