[squid-users] Re: StoreID and concurrency?

From: babajaga <augustus_meyer_at_yahoo.de>
Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2013 11:47:07 -0700 (PDT)

>We have these in the StoreID part of the docs since there is no chance
of doing a refresh_pattern on StoreID without understanding the concept. <
That is NOT the point.
As far as I understand,
up to including squid2.7 the refresh_pattern was based on the transaction
URL, whether storeurl_rewrite_program was used, or not.
And using StoreID changes the picture: When using StoreID-Rewrite,
refresh_pattern now is based on StoreID.

As a normal user, this is not obvious, when converting from 2.7, OR when
simply trying to use StoreID.
So a hint in squid.conf should be written. Just my few cents.

>I just saw a small probably bug that you need to state the maximum
object size of cache_dir object per cache_dir so try these on the way?? <
Looks like a regression to me. I remember being involved in detecting this
problem quite some time ago.

--
View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/StoreID-and-concurrency-tp4660340p4660500.html
Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Received on Sun Jun 09 2013 - 18:47:49 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Jun 10 2013 - 12:00:11 MDT