Re: [squid-users] high memory usage (squid 3.2.0)

From: Amos Jeffries <squid3_at_treenet.co.nz>
Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2013 00:58:09 +1200

On 10/08/2013 11:22 p.m., Dash Four wrote:
> It needs to be noted that there is no (significant) differences in the
> configuration between the old and the new versions, apart from minor
> corrections to account for changed option names (transition from 3.2.0
> to 3.3.4). There isn't any difference in the usage (nature or
> intensity) either. Apart from a new kernel, the only difference is the
> new squid version.
>
> Conclusion: squid 3.2.0 should be confined to the dust bin!

Indeed. 3.2.0.* are beta releases :-) and the whole 3.2 series is now
deprecated by 3.3.* which itself is soon to be deprecated by 3.4.
(although one bad decision has turned 3.4.0.1 into a train wreck I'm not
even announcing widely).

>
> I've read an advisory which recommends upgrading to 3.3.7 (and now
> 3.3.8 is released), so I'll upgrade to that in the coming days, but
> wanted to post this update in the meantime for the benefit of this group.

Amos
Received on Sat Aug 10 2013 - 12:58:21 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Aug 10 2013 - 12:00:08 MDT