[squid-users] Re: cache_dir size v.s. available RAM

From: HillTopsGM <emailgregagain_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2013 15:39:41 -0700 (PDT)

The rule-of-thumb is 15MB *per GB of cache size*.

Thanks Amos - that's the rule of thumb I was looking for.

Somewhere along the way I thought I saw 10MB per GB of Cache but it was
vague.

I was also given a piece of advice to maybe create multiple directories of
no more than 100 GB per.
I am guessing that this was to address the 16 256 Question I had in Question
2.

*IF* that is the case, would increasing it to 32 256 and having 1 cache
directory of 200GB not do the same thing as having 2 100GB caches with each
set at 16 256?

I ask only to try and better understand what it is that is taking place with
the setup.

--
View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/cache-dir-size-v-s-available-RAM-tp4661705p4661758.html
Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Received on Sat Aug 24 2013 - 22:40:24 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Aug 25 2013 - 12:00:05 MDT