Hey,
I cannot tell you it's the case since I do not tend to verify that
tproxy works on every squid release due to the basic small changes that
happen from minor version to the other.
I test it on the first major release such as 3.3 and 3.4 and then don't
tend to check it later.
But I am not sure this is the case...
I have tested squid 3.4 for tproxy more then once so it seems like it
should work and if non of the working setups that upgraded complained I
assumed it stays this way.
But lets try another way, run the debugging script from:
http://www1.ngtech.co.il/squid/basic_data.sh
As a root user
also add to your squid.conf the line:
"debug_options ALL,1 89,9 17,3"
and restart squid.
This will give you more information in squid and will show you some
output in cache.log that will make us understand what is the situation
with tproxy requests..
If you do not get the website it doesn't mean that squid does what it id
does good.
It is possible that other things are bad..
Eliezer
P.S. I am at the #squid irc channel at freenode and using this link:
http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=squid
You can get there and talk to me.
My nick name is "elico"
On 07/05/2014 05:15 PM, Nyamul Hassan wrote:
> I apologize Eliezer if my words meant that Squid in general was
> flawed. On the contrary, we have been using Squid 2 for almost 6
> years over multiple proxies, and have only found it to be among the
> exceptional open source softwares out there. And, the community
> behind Squid also compares to the top few in the open source world.
>
> What I meant was, perhaps the version of Squid that I am using (3.4.6)
> has some changes that might have caused the TProxy to break
> temporarily.
>
> I'll have a go with other older versions and check further.
>
> Wish me luck!
>
> Regards
> HASSAN
Received on Sat Jul 05 2014 - 21:16:04 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jul 06 2014 - 12:00:05 MDT