Re: [squid-users] squid: Memory utilization higher than expected since moving from 3.3 to 3.4 and Vary: working

On 07/18/2014 04:09 AM, Martin Sperl wrote:

> So the memory foot-print stayed fairly stable at around 10GB for
> about 2.5 month (or at least a long portion of that time)

OK, no leak then.

As you said, the gradually increasing overhead per cache entry that you
have reported earlier does not quite match the "stable footprint" claim
you are making above, so something still does not add up, and I really
hesitate offering any more theories based on shaky input data.

Does your Squid use SSL encryption/decryption?

> I have posted the raw data as an excel sheet including graphs to the
> ticket: http://bugs.squid-cache.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4084

Thank you for sharing the data. Just FYI: My Libreoffice on Ubuntu
cannot display those graphs (but others can probably view them on
Windows, and it is probably possible to reconstruct them from raw data
as well).

Cheers,

Alex.
Received on Fri Jul 18 2014 - 14:41:10 MDT