Duane Wessels wrote:
> The new storeDiskdDirCallback, however, doesn't loop over all dirs. It
> blocks one just one dir at a time. In fact, the way its written now,
> it would just chew up CPU needlessly. You might as well change
> ICP_NOWAIT to "0" if away > magic2. The old storeDiskdReadQueue
> also chewed up CPU, but I would not say that it was needless.
>
> Am I missing something?
No you are not. Similar concerns applies to the aufs code.
The callback should be a more generic kind where different I/O "modules"
(Squid AIO, diskd, ...) can register themselves, and not directly tied
to the cache_dir instances.
/Henrik
Received on Fri May 12 2000 - 12:00:15 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:12:25 MST