Re: RC1 time

From: Alex Rousskov <rousskov@dont-contact.us>
Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2007 23:14:16 -0600

On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 10:30 +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 01, 2007, Duane Wessels wrote:
> > squid-3.0.RC1 is now on the master web/ftp sites for download.
> >
> > Is now a good time to branch the CVS tree? Or would folks rather
> > wait until the first stable release?
>
> I'd leave it until after 3.0.STABLE1 actually. Leave it until
> we're in agreement its stable and

I have no opinion on this part yet. I think folks with big pending
Squid3 patches or branches should decide.

> there's a TODO list for 3.1.

Deciding what to do in v3.1 should not affect branching v3.0 out, IMO.
My understanding is that once v3.0 is branched out, it is closed for any
significant development other than bug fixes. What features or changes
will eventually be in v3.1 should not affect that, should it?

We already have "a TODO list" draft for 3.1:
http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&product=Squid&version=3.0&target_milestone=---&target_milestone=3.1&bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&bug_status=VERIFIED

This is not exact, complete, or comprehensive (e.g., I assume IPv6
support will be in v3.1 but ESI may not be), but can be a good starting
point for the discussion.

Thanks,

Alex.
Received on Mon Oct 01 2007 - 23:14:32 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Oct 30 2007 - 13:00:03 MDT