Re: RC1 time

> On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 10:30 +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 01, 2007, Duane Wessels wrote:
>> > squid-3.0.RC1 is now on the master web/ftp sites for download.
>> >
>> > Is now a good time to branch the CVS tree? Or would folks rather
>> > wait until the first stable release?
>>
>> I'd leave it until after 3.0.STABLE1 actually. Leave it until
>> we're in agreement its stable and
>
> I have no opinion on this part yet. I think folks with big pending
> Squid3 patches or branches should decide.
>
>> there's a TODO list for 3.1.
>
> Deciding what to do in v3.1 should not affect branching v3.0 out, IMO.
> My understanding is that once v3.0 is branched out, it is closed for any
> significant development other than bug fixes. What features or changes
> will eventually be in v3.1 should not affect that, should it?
>
> We already have "a TODO list" draft for 3.1:
> http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&product=Squid&version=3.0&target_milestone=---&target_milestone=3.1&bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&bug_status=VERIFIED
>
> This is not exact, complete, or comprehensive (e.g., I assume IPv6
> support will be in v3.1 but ESI may not be), but can be a good starting
> point for the discussion.

There is also this one with a few more items:
http://wiki.squid-cache.org/Squid-3.1#head-533b554b1cc28966bbe9409b58a19bb1fe2ee7f1

Speaking of which.
Adrian:
  You added the Comm-Layer re-write as first on that list. Is the code
ready to be patched on immediately after the branching? or is there
going to be a development delay while it gets written and tested?

Amos
Received on Tue Oct 02 2007 - 00:16:38 MDT