RE: [squid-users] Fedora

I got the service working. Now my old configuration from version 2.4 is not working on 3.0 Stable 2. In theory the traffic was coming from a load balancer and hit the Proxy server. The proxy server then will request 10.2.0.140 for the content.

When I try to start the service with my old configuration is having problems with the following lines, is the syntax different?

acl all src 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0 ***warning***
| acl manager proto cache_object
| acl localhost src 127.0.0.1/255.255.255.255 acl to_localhost dst
| 127.0.0.0/8 acl ssl_ports ports 443 563 acl safe_port port 80 acl
| safe_port ....
| acl connect method connect
| acl mylan src 127.0.0.1 ***Fatal Error***
| acl mysites 10.2.0.140 *** Fatal Error***
|
| http_access allow manager localhost
| http_access deny manager
| http_access deny !safe_port
| http_access deny to_localhost
| http_access allow mysites
| http_access deny all
|
| http_reply_access allow MYLAN ***Fatal Error***
| http_reply_access allow all

Even with the default config I am not able to telnet to port 80 on the squid server.

Thanks

Gustavo

-----Original Message-----
From: Christopher Bianchi [mailto:chris_at_tactek.com]
Sent: Friday, September 12, 2008 1:19 PM
To: squid-users_at_squid-cache.org
Subject: Re: [squid-users] Fedora

Squid, itself, is a very stable application. Your stability limitation is
more likely to be with Fedora.

I don't know that you can combine "Fedora" and "Stable". The Fedora team
considers the entire operating system as "cutting-edge" and anything but
stable. Fedora is (pretty much) a "beta test" for the next version of Red
Hat Enterprise.

If you're looking for stability in the Red Hat model, you should
investigate RHEL or CentOS.

But that's just my 2 cents.

Chris Bianchi

On Fri, September 12, 2008 1:07 pm, Gustavo Lazarte wrote:
> Is squid stable on fedora 8?
>
> Thanks
>
>
Received on Sat Sep 13 2008 - 02:01:11 MDT