Amos Jeffries-2 wrote:
>
> On 04/03/11 04:58, mbruell wrote:
>
>> Should we be seeing traffic on the lo interface when it's all working
>> correctly? The packet count on lo is very low, and doesn't change when
>> trying to proxy the traffic.
>>
>
> Okay, try adding the special route table to eth0 as well. If that still
> fails try adding it to wccp0.
> I'd like to know the results here. It works on lo for some but seems
> not everyone, though I have not yet had concrete confirmation that it
> matters.
>
Can you give me an example of this? I don't quite know what this would be.
-- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/Client-timing-out-when-using-squid-as-tproxy-tp3243429p3333776.html Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.Received on Thu Mar 03 2011 - 17:21:43 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Mar 04 2011 - 12:00:01 MST