On 04/03/11 06:21, mbruell wrote:
>
> Amos Jeffries-2 wrote:
>>
>> On 04/03/11 04:58, mbruell wrote:
>>
>>> Should we be seeing traffic on the lo interface when it's all working
>>> correctly? The packet count on lo is very low, and doesn't change when
>>> trying to proxy the traffic.
>>>
>>
>> Okay, try adding the special route table to eth0 as well. If that still
>> fails try adding it to wccp0.
>> I'd like to know the results here. It works on lo for some but seems
>> not everyone, though I have not yet had concrete confirmation that it
>> matters.
>>
>
> Can you give me an example of this? I don't quite know what this would be.
http://wiki.squid-cache.org/Features/Tproxy4#Routing_configuration
I've updated the config to show eth90 as well as lo. Since many people
seems to require it on the main interface.
Amos
-- Please be using Current Stable Squid 2.7.STABLE9 or 3.1.11 Beta testers wanted for 3.2.0.5Received on Fri Mar 04 2011 - 05:08:27 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Mar 04 2011 - 12:00:01 MST