On 2/5/2011 11:26 AM, Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
> On 05/03/2011 06:16, christian_at_wanxp.com wrote:
>
>> Dear,
>>
>> i installed and run 2 squid2.7 in same machine for balance CPU load
>> (quadcore proc). my question are can i do sibling between 2 squid in
>> same machine for sharing cache ? will it cause any problem in future
>> ? any1 have experience bout this issue ?
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Kristian
> it seems like a good idea.
> if you will bind every squid instance to other ip address or you cand
> bind each one of them to a loopback interface with a mask of 32 bit
> i think you can manage theoretically to make it work.
> i never tried it and if it can work then i think i will do some use of
> this.
>
> but my question is: how do i bind an instance to a specific cpu\core?
>
>
Dear,
i`m not expert for this issue but i think we cant specific the core for
squid. it will run automaticly. 1 squid only can take 1 core. if i run 2
squid it will take 2 core ( using command "top" to view ).
i tried SIBLING (htcp) and it worked , but i just want to know will it
cause any trouble like unlimited loopback or memory leak or something
like that. i hope any1 can explain it better for me.
Regards,
Kristian
Received on Sat Mar 05 2011 - 04:41:02 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Mar 05 2011 - 12:00:01 MST