Re: [squid-users] Multi Squid Same Machine with Sibling

From: Eliezer Croitoru <eliezer_at_ec.hadorhabaac.com>
Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2011 07:07:17 +0200

On 05/03/2011 06:40, christian_at_wanxp.com wrote:

> On 2/5/2011 11:26 AM, Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
>> On 05/03/2011 06:16, christian_at_wanxp.com wrote:
>>
>>> Dear,
>>>
>>> i installed and run 2 squid2.7 in same machine for balance CPU load
>>> (quadcore proc). my question are can i do sibling between 2 squid in
>>> same machine for sharing cache ? will it cause any problem in future
>>> ? any1 have experience bout this issue ?
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Kristian
>> it seems like a good idea.
>> if you will bind every squid instance to other ip address or you cand
>> bind each one of them to a loopback interface with a mask of 32 bit
>> i think you can manage theoretically to make it work.
>> i never tried it and if it can work then i think i will do some use
>> of this.
>>
>> but my question is: how do i bind an instance to a specific cpu\core?
>>
>>
>
> Dear,
>
> i`m not expert for this issue but i think we cant specific the core
> for squid. it will run automaticly. 1 squid only can take 1 core. if i
> run 2 squid it will take 2 core ( using command "top" to view ).
>
> i tried SIBLING (htcp) and it worked , but i just want to know will it
> cause any trouble like unlimited loopback or memory leak or something
> like that. i hope any1 can explain it better for me.
>
> Regards,
>
> Kristian
What do you mean by unlimited loopback? if it works then i think
loopback is your last problem.
as far as i understand memory leaks will stay the same with one instance
and two.

i understand you compiled them yourself to make the instances with
different settings? directories? etc..

Thanks Eliezer
Received on Sat Mar 05 2011 - 05:10:44 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Mar 05 2011 - 12:00:01 MST