On 13/12/2012 9:41 p.m., Muhammed Shehata wrote:
> Dear Amos,
> -the interrelation:
> the logs are from two squid similar servers that only differ in
> version and client at both request doesn't disconnect or anything the
> aborted maybe mean that squid can't get this url contains java script
> but what I wonder of why squid can get it successfully
> -here is the logs with time :
> squid2 on Centos5.2 > 1355387935.418 7 x.x.x.x TCP_MISS/304 324
> GET http://cdn.optimizely.com/js/128727546.js - DIRECT/23.50.196.211
> text/javascript
> squid3 on Centos 6.3 >
> 13/Dec/2012:10:39:05 +0200 20020 x.x.x.x TCP_MISS_ABORTED/000 0 GET
> http://cdn.optimizely.com/js/128727546.js -
> HIER_DIRECT/cdn.optimizely.com -
> 13/Dec/2012:10:39:25 +0200 20020 x.x.x.x TCP_MISS_ABORTED/000 0 GET
> http://cdn.optimizely.com/js/128727546.js -
> HIER_DIRECT/cdn.optimizely.com -
>
Aha. Thanks this makes more sense. 7ms with a response versus 20 seconds
with nothing returned.
Although for better debug you should get the squid-3 to leave upstream
server IP address in the log. It could be some problem of which IP is
being connected to by Squid.
With 3.2 at "debugs_options 11,2" you get a cache.log HTTP trace of what
is going between Squid and optimizely and client. I suspect optimizely
is not responding when a request is delivered to them - but you need to
track that down.
Amos
Received on Thu Dec 13 2012 - 21:58:53 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Dec 17 2012 - 12:00:04 MST