Re: [squid-users] Squid3 extremely slow for some website cnn.com

2nd file for large attach size

Best Regards,
*Muhammad Shehata*
IT Network Security Engineer
TEData
Building A11- B90, Smart Village
Km 28 Cairo - Alex Desert Road, 6th October, 12577, Egypt
T: +20 (2) 33 32 0700 | Ext: 1532
F: +20 (2) 33 32 0800 | M:
E: m.shehata_at_tedata.net
On 12/13/2012 11:58 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
>
> On 13/12/2012 9:41 p.m., Muhammed Shehata wrote:
>> Dear Amos,
>> -the interrelation:
>> the logs are from two squid similar servers that only differ in
>> version and client at both request doesn't disconnect or anything the
>> aborted maybe mean that squid can't get this url contains java script
>> but what I wonder of why squid can get it successfully
>> -here is the logs with time :
>> squid2 on Centos5.2 > 1355387935.418 7 x.x.x.x TCP_MISS/304 324
>> GET http://cdn.optimizely.com/js/128727546.js - DIRECT/23.50.196.211
>> text/javascript
>> squid3 on Centos 6.3 >
>> 13/Dec/2012:10:39:05 +0200 20020 x.x.x.x TCP_MISS_ABORTED/000 0 GET
>> http://cdn.optimizely.com/js/128727546.js -
>> HIER_DIRECT/cdn.optimizely.com -
>> 13/Dec/2012:10:39:25 +0200 20020 x.x.x.x TCP_MISS_ABORTED/000 0 GET
>> http://cdn.optimizely.com/js/128727546.js -
>> HIER_DIRECT/cdn.optimizely.com -
>>
>
> Aha. Thanks this makes more sense. 7ms with a response versus 20
> seconds with nothing returned.
>
> Although for better debug you should get the squid-3 to leave upstream
> server IP address in the log. It could be some problem of which IP is
> being connected to by Squid.
>
> With 3.2 at "debugs_options 11,2" you get a cache.log HTTP trace of
> what is going between Squid and optimizely and client. I suspect
> optimizely is not responding when a request is delivered to them - but
> you need to track that down.
>
> Amos